The norming stage feels like stability, Everyone knows how to work together, how things flow, who is responsible for what and how each individual likes to work. The norming stage, when cohesive, is engaging, empowering, motivating and team members feel like they belong. Unfortunately, many team normalise dysfunction to some degree. This is where much of my work is spent - moving from dysfunction to cohesion.

Behavioural Level:

The team is more stable and should be making progress towards goals. Their is a rhythm to the work, and the jigsaw pieces are fitting together. Goals are clear and relationships are more established, enabling members to draw on each other’s strengths and freeing members up to collaboratively. Team ‘norms’, or habits of behaving and working together, have become well established, so the team no longer needs to invest energy in how to get things done. Natural leaders have emerged, and leadership is therefore more distributed.

Now, many organisations have aspirational values plastered over the walls. The real values and culture is what you see in the team norms. Teams, even within a bigger organisation, will have their own team norms. As a leader, you observe whether they are aligned to the organisational norms, if they are helping or hindering performance, and whether to intervene.

Psychological level: 

Team members begin to feel a sense of WE and I. They understand where they fit in the team and how it contributes to the performance of the team. People are valued not by their job title, but also for who they are, their values, strengths, weaknesses and patterns of behaviour. They feel able to be themselves and take off the masks. If you aren't seeing this, then you are probably still stuck in storming or forming.

Members of norming teams feel more confidence in their ability to resolve disagreements and positively challenge and engage in solutions. They understand others personalities, and have found productive ways to work together. A sense of loyalty grows. Members may feel safe to offer time, expertise and resources with each other, for the good of the team. 

Leader’s role: 

If you've reached this stage, and the norms are cohesive, you are doing well. You can step back a bit, manage less and lead more. Team members will want to step up and assume more responsibility because they care about the outcomes. Leaders facilitate healthy debate, stretch, grow, develop and inspire the team to be more, do more and have fun along the way. However, Leaders must keep a holistic view, so they can spot any negative relationships, norms or behaviours that creep in. Notice when deadlines are missed, blame creeps in or engagement drops. Act fast before you slip to dysfunctional norms.


Transitioning into the norming stage is when people find a way to resolve their differences, appreciate colleague’s strengths and weaknesses, and respect the authority of the leader. Theoretically, the team moves to high performance. Yet this is normally the phase most teams get stuck in. 

A case study

A leadership team I worked with had been together for 12 months. Some members had worked with the leader for over 10 years. Some had been invited in due to restructures. 2 had been head hunted by the leader for their talents. They had gone through the norming stage, then had some major fall outs in the storming phase. Now they were in the norming phase and it was not healthy.


Neil was one of the established team members and had blocked the ideas and changes being introduced by the new members. The new members had tried to assert their boundaries, yet Neil would not back down. Rather than focusing on the dysfunction, the leader swept it under the carpet and hoped it would naturally resolve itself.


The norm now was for Neil to show up at meetings, blocking everything because that was the role he had adopted. The newer members formed an alliance and although did not challenge publicly anymore, they would ignore Neil in everyday operations. Information was withheld from him and he was excluded from conversations wherever possible.


This was their normal and it was harming the team. 


On a positive note, norming teams may engage in socialising, informal conversations and ask each other for help and provide constructive feedback. There is a rhythm to everyone's work, and what feels like flow. People develop a stronger commitment to the team goal, and you start to see progress towards it, taking a level of autonomy and personal responsibility for their work.  

Conflict subsides, but often to the point that no healthy conflict exists. People get in their lanes and stay there. This might sound like the dream team, but often norming means settling for ease over striving for performance. 

As new tasks or methods come up teams may fall back into storming, but the leader can progress to norming through open dialogue and practicing trust and communication. 

Shortcuts to moving into the Performing phase

1. A natural rhythm forms. You are still very present and managing, but you are able to step back. 


2. Members develop themselves, set their own work patterns and make decisions. 


3. You can delegate more and trust members to deliver. 


4. Members accept responsibility and allow others to own it. 


5. You praise good behaviours and performance, recognise, and acknowledge performance. 


6. Role models and champions are highlighted. 


Something to Consider...

The reality is that without doing the MyTeam step, teams get stuck in storming and that becomes the norm. It might show up as cliques, gossip, or conflict. It might look like missed targets, late meetings, or confusion over responsibilities. Few people recognise that their team is not truly successful because so few of us have actually experienced being part of a truly successful team.


Discover more from 3WH

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}
>